Eva Alonso Ortiz, Daniel S. Papp, Robert Barry, Kyota Poëti, Alan C. Seifert, Kyle M. Gilbert, Nibardo Lopez Rios, Jan Paska, Falk Eippert, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Laura Beghini, Nadine N. Graedel, Robert Trampel, Martina F. Callaghan, Christoph Stefan Aigner, Patrick Freund, Maryam Seif, Aurélien Destruel, Virginie Callot, S. Johanna Vannesjo et Julien Cohen-Adad
Article de revue (2025)
|
Libre accès au plein texte de ce document Version officielle de l'éditeur Conditions d'utilisation: Creative Commons: Attribution-Utilisation non commerciale-Pas d'oeuvre dérivée (CC BY-NC-ND) Télécharger (11MB) |
|
|
Libre accès au plein texte de ce document Matériel supplémentaire Conditions d'utilisation: Creative Commons: Attribution-Utilisation non commerciale-Pas d'oeuvre dérivée (CC BY-NC-ND) Télécharger (1MB) |
Abstract
Purpose: The depth within the body, small diameter, long length, and varying tissue surrounding the spinal cord impose specific considerations when designing RF coils. The optimal coil configuration for 7 T cervical spinal cord MRI is unknown and currently there are very few coil options. The purpose of this work was (1) to establish a quality control protocol for evaluating 7 T cervical spinal cord coils, and (2) to use that protocol to evaluate the performance of four different coil designs. Methods: Three healthy volunteers and a custom anthropomorphic phantom (the traveling spines cohort) were scanned at seven 7 T imaging centers using a common protocol and each center's specific cervical spinal cord coil. Four different coil designs were tested (two in-house, one Rapid Biomedical, and one MRI.TOOLS design). Results: The Rapid Biomedical coil was found to have the highest B+1 efficiency, whereas one of the in-house designs (NeuroPoly Lab) had the highest SNR and the largest spinal cord coverage. The MRI.TOOLS coil had the most uniform B+1 profile along the cervical spinal cord; however, it was limited in its ability to provide the requested flip angles (especially for larger individuals). The latter was also the case for the second in-house coil (MSSM). Conclusion: The results of this study serve as a guide for the spinal cord MRI community in selecting the most suitable coil based on specific requirements and offer a standardized protocol for assessing future coils.
| Département: | Département de génie électrique |
|---|---|
| Centre de recherche: | NeuroPoly - Laboratoire de Recherche en Neuroimagerie |
| Organismes subventionnaires: | NSERC, Canada First Research Excellence Fund (CFREF), Canada Research Chair in Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), Fonds de Recherche du Québec–Santé (FRQS), Québec Bio-imaging Network (QBIN) |
| URL de PolyPublie: | https://publications.polymtl.ca/65913/ |
| Titre de la revue: | Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (vol. 94, no 3) |
| Maison d'édition: | Wiley |
| DOI: | 10.1002/mrm.30551 |
| URL officielle: | https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30551 |
| Date du dépôt: | 03 juin 2025 10:39 |
| Dernière modification: | 26 nov. 2025 17:48 |
| Citer en APA 7: | Alonso Ortiz, E., Papp, D. S., Barry, R., Poëti, K., Seifert, A. C., Gilbert, K. M., Lopez Rios, N., Paska, J., Eippert, F., Weiskopf, N., Beghini, L., Graedel, N. N., Trampel, R., Callaghan, M. F., Stefan Aigner, C., Freund, P., Seif, M., Destruel, A., Callot, V., ... Cohen-Adad, J. (2025). Multi‐center benchmarking of cervical spinal cord RF coils for 7 T MRI: A traveling spines study. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 94(3), 1339-1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30551 |
|---|---|
Statistiques
Total des téléchargements à partir de PolyPublie
Téléchargements par année
Provenance des téléchargements
Dimensions
