Hélène Hauduc, L. Rieger, A. Oehmen, M. van Loosdrecht, Yves Comeau, A. Héduit, Peter A. Vanrolleghem et Sylvie Fillot
Article de revue (2012)
|
Libre accès au plein texte de ce document Version finale avant publication Conditions d'utilisation: Tous droits réservés Télécharger (799kB) |
|
|
Libre accès au plein texte de ce document Matériel supplémentaire Conditions d'utilisation: Tous droits réservés Télécharger (454kB) |
Abstract
This work critically reviews modeling concepts for standard activated sludge wastewater treatment processes (e.g., hydrolysis, growth and decay of organisms, etc.) for some of the most commonly used models. Based on a short overview on the theoretical biochemistry knowledge this review should help model users to better understand (i) the model concepts used; (ii) the differences between models, and (iii) the limits of the models. The seven analyzed models are: (1) ASM1; (2) ASM2d; (3) ASM3; (4) ASM3 + BioP; (5) ASM2d + TUD; (6) Barker & Dold model; and (7) UCTPHO+. Nine standard processes are distinguished and discussed in the present work: hydrolysis; fermentation; ordinary heterotrophic organisms (OHO) growth; autotrophic nitrifying organisms (ANO) growth; OHO & ANO decay; poly-hydroxyalkanoates (PHA) storage; polyphosphate (polyP) storage; phosphorus accumulating organisms PAO) growth; and PAO decay. For a structured comparison, a new schematic representation of these processes is proposed. Each process is represented as a reaction with consumed components on the left of the figure and produced components on the right. Standardized icons, based on shapes and color codes, enable the representation of the stoichiometric modeling concepts and kinetics. This representation allows highlighting the conceptual differences of the models, and the level of simplification between the concepts and the theoretical knowledge. The model selection depending on their theoretical limitations and the main research needs to increase the model quality are finally discussed.
Mots clés
| Département: | Département des génies civil, géologique et des mines |
|---|---|
| URL de PolyPublie: | https://publications.polymtl.ca/13755/ |
| Titre de la revue: | Biotechnology and Bioengineering (vol. 110, no 1) |
| Maison d'édition: | Wiley Blackwell |
| DOI: | 10.1002/bit.24624 |
| URL officielle: | https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24624 |
| Date du dépôt: | 18 avr. 2023 15:09 |
| Dernière modification: | 21 déc. 2025 10:27 |
| Citer en APA 7: | Hauduc, H., Rieger, L., Oehmen, A., van Loosdrecht, M., Comeau, Y., Héduit, A., Vanrolleghem, P. A., & Fillot, S. (2012). Critical review of activated sludge modelling : State of process knowledge, modelling concepts, and limitations. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 110(1), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24624 |
|---|---|
Statistiques
Total des téléchargements à partir de PolyPublie
Téléchargements par année
Provenance des téléchargements
Dimensions
