Hélène Hauduc, L. Rieger, A. Oehmen, M. van Loosdrecht, Yves Comeau, A. Héduit, Peter A. Vanrolleghem and Sylvie Fillot
Article (2012)
|
Open Access to the full text of this document Accepted Version Terms of Use: All rights reserved Download (799kB) |
|
|
Open Access to the full text of this document Supplemental Material Terms of Use: All rights reserved Download (454kB) |
Abstract
This work critically reviews modeling concepts for standard activated sludge wastewater treatment processes (e.g., hydrolysis, growth and decay of organisms, etc.) for some of the most commonly used models. Based on a short overview on the theoretical biochemistry knowledge this review should help model users to better understand (i) the model concepts used; (ii) the differences between models, and (iii) the limits of the models. The seven analyzed models are: (1) ASM1; (2) ASM2d; (3) ASM3; (4) ASM3 + BioP; (5) ASM2d + TUD; (6) Barker & Dold model; and (7) UCTPHO+. Nine standard processes are distinguished and discussed in the present work: hydrolysis; fermentation; ordinary heterotrophic organisms (OHO) growth; autotrophic nitrifying organisms (ANO) growth; OHO & ANO decay; poly-hydroxyalkanoates (PHA) storage; polyphosphate (polyP) storage; phosphorus accumulating organisms PAO) growth; and PAO decay. For a structured comparison, a new schematic representation of these processes is proposed. Each process is represented as a reaction with consumed components on the left of the figure and produced components on the right. Standardized icons, based on shapes and color codes, enable the representation of the stoichiometric modeling concepts and kinetics. This representation allows highlighting the conceptual differences of the models, and the level of simplification between the concepts and the theoretical knowledge. The model selection depending on their theoretical limitations and the main research needs to increase the model quality are finally discussed.
Uncontrolled Keywords
| Department: | Department of Civil, Geological and Mining Engineering |
|---|---|
| PolyPublie URL: | https://publications.polymtl.ca/13755/ |
| Journal Title: | Biotechnology and Bioengineering (vol. 110, no. 1) |
| Publisher: | Wiley Blackwell |
| DOI: | 10.1002/bit.24624 |
| Official URL: | https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24624 |
| Date Deposited: | 18 Apr 2023 15:09 |
| Last Modified: | 06 Mar 2026 06:57 |
| Cite in APA 7: | Hauduc, H., Rieger, L., Oehmen, A., van Loosdrecht, M., Comeau, Y., Héduit, A., Vanrolleghem, P. A., & Fillot, S. (2012). Critical review of activated sludge modelling : State of process knowledge, modelling concepts, and limitations. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 110(1), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24624 |
|---|---|
Statistics
Total downloads
Downloads per month in the last year
Origin of downloads
Dimensions
