Critical review of activated sludge modelling : State of process knowledge, modelling concepts, and limitations

Hélène Hauduc, L. Rieger, A. Oehmen, M. van Loosdrecht, Yves Comeau, A. Héduit, Peter A. Vanrolleghem, Sylvie Fillot

Article de revue (2012)

Accéder à ce document
Disponible
Libre accès au texte intégral dans PolyPublie
Version finale avant publication
Texte Texte • 799kB •
Matériel supplémentaire
Texte Texte • 454kB •

Résumé

This work critically reviews modeling concepts for standard activated sludge wastewater treatment processes (e.g., hydrolysis, growth and decay of organisms, etc.) for some of the most commonly used models. Based on a short overview on the theoretical biochemistry knowledge this review should help model users to better understand (i) the model concepts used; (ii) the differences between models, and (iii) the limits of the models. The seven analyzed models are: (1) ASM1; (2) ASM2d; (3) ASM3; (4) ASM3 + BioP; (5) ASM2d + TUD; (6) Barker & Dold model; and (7) UCTPHO+. Nine standard processes are distinguished and discussed in the present work: hydrolysis; fermentation; ordinary heterotrophic organisms (OHO) growth; autotrophic nitrifying organisms (ANO) growth; OHO & ANO decay; poly-hydroxyalkanoates (PHA) storage; polyphosphate (polyP) storage; phosphorus accumulating organisms PAO) growth; and PAO decay. For a structured comparison, a new schematic representation of these processes is proposed. Each process is represented as a reaction with consumed components on the left of the figure and produced components on the right. Standardized icons, based on shapes and color codes, enable the representation of the stoichiometric modeling concepts and kinetics. This representation allows highlighting the conceptual differences of the models, and the level of simplification between the concepts and the theoretical knowledge. The model selection depending on their theoretical limitations and the main research needs to increase the model quality are finally discussed.

Mots clés

Adresse URL de PolyPublie:
Titre de la revue :
Biotechnology and Bioengineering ( vol. 110 , no 1 )
Maison d'édition:
Wiley Blackwell
OAI:
oai:publications.polymtl.ca:13755
ORCID
Date du dépôt:
18 avr. 2023 15:09
Dernière modification:
14 oct. 2026 11:14
Citer en APA 7:
Hauduc, H., Rieger, L., Oehmen, A., van Loosdrecht, M., Comeau, Y., Héduit, A., Vanrolleghem, P. A., & Fillot, S. (2012). Critical review of activated sludge modelling : State of process knowledge, modelling concepts, and limitations. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 110(1), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24624

Statistiques

Total des téléchargements à partir de PolyPublie

Téléchargements par année

Provenance des téléchargements

Dimensions

Actions réservées au personnel

Afficher document
Afficher document