Ehsan Mortazavi, Philippe Doyon-Poulin, Daniel Imbeau, Mitra Taraghi et Jean-Marc Robert
Article de revue (2024)
Accès restreint: Personnel autorisé jusqu'au 31 mai 2025 Version finale avant publication Conditions d'utilisation: Tous droits réservés Demander document |
Abstract
The quality of the User Experience (UX) with systems, products and services is now considered an indispensable part of success in the market. Users' expectations have increased in such a way that mere usability is no longer sufficient. While numerous UX subjective evaluation tools exist, there is little guidance on how to select or use these tools. Therefore, there is a need to provide a critical state of the art on the topic of subjective evaluation tools and the UX dimensions covered. In this study, we conducted a systematic literature review on UX subjective evaluation tools and the UX dimensions covering the period of 2010–2021 with an initial sample of 3831 publications, 325 of which were selected for the final analysis, to provide researchers and practitioners with the recent changes in the field of UX. Results showed that 104 different tools are available for UX evaluation, they can be classified as general or domain-specific, applicable for a wide variety of products and in total covering more than 300 UX dimensions. Our categorization of UX dimensions under 13 main dimensions (e.g. usability, utility, hedonic, emotion, sensory, etc.) showed that the informational, social, cognitive and physical dimensions appeared to be less frequently present in current tools. We argue that these four dimensions deserve more space in UX tools. Having a high number of UX evaluation tools can be confusing for evaluators, and they need some guidance for selecting and combining tools. Modularity is the emerging trend in the development of UX evaluation questionnaires (e.g. meCUE, UEQ+), bringing the benefits of being thorough, flexible, easy to use, low-cost and rapid, while avoiding overlapping of dimensions and providing comparability through the use of a similar format and rating scale. Finally, the need for having a comprehensive evaluation tool requires updating the set of included dimensions to accommodate for new generations of products and technologies.
Mots clés
human-centered computing; human-computer interaction (HCI); user experience; UX evaluation tool; UX dimension; systematic literature review; SLR
Sujet(s): |
1600 Génie industriel > 1600 Génie industriel 1600 Génie industriel > 1605 Génie des facteurs humains |
---|---|
Département: | Département de mathématiques et de génie industriel |
Organismes subventionnaires: | NSERC / CRSNG |
URL de PolyPublie: | https://publications.polymtl.ca/58579/ |
Titre de la revue: | Interacting with Computers |
Maison d'édition: | Oxford University Press |
DOI: | 10.1093/iwc/iwae017 |
URL officielle: | https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwae017 |
Date du dépôt: | 06 juin 2024 14:37 |
Dernière modification: | 30 sept. 2024 23:20 |
Citer en APA 7: | Mortazavi, E., Doyon-Poulin, P., Imbeau, D., Taraghi, M., & Robert, J.-M. (2024). Exploring the landscape of UX subjective evaluation tools and UX dimensions : a systematic literature review (2010-2021). Interacting with Computers, iwae017 (39 pages). https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwae017 |
---|---|
Statistiques
Total des téléchargements à partir de PolyPublie
Téléchargements par année
Provenance des téléchargements
Dimensions