<  Retour au portail Polytechnique Montréal

ZOOM or non-ZOOM? Assessing spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging protocols for multi-centre studies

Rebecca S. Samson, Simon Lévy, Torben Schneider, Alex K. Smith, Seth A. Smith, Julien Cohen-Adad et Claudia Angela M. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott

Article de revue (2016)

Document en libre accès dans PolyPublie et chez l'éditeur officiel
[img]
Affichage préliminaire
Libre accès au plein texte de ce document
Version officielle de l'éditeur
Conditions d'utilisation: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY)
Télécharger (863kB)
Afficher le résumé
Cacher le résumé

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate two spinal cord (SC) diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) protocols, implemented at multiple sites (using scanners from two different manufacturers), one available on any clinical scanner, and one using more advanced options currently available in the research setting, and to use an automated processing method for unbiased quantification. DTI parameters are sensitive to changes in the diseased SC. However, imaging the cord can be technically challenging due to various factors including its small size, patient-related and physiological motion, and field inhomogeneities. Rapid acquisition sequences such as Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) are desirable but may suffer from image distortions. We present a multi-centre comparison of two acquisition protocols implemented on scanners from two different vendors (Siemens and Philips), one using a reduced field-of-view (rFOV) EPI sequence, and one only using options available on standard clinical scanners such as outer volume suppression (OVS). Automatic analysis was performed with the Spinal Cord Toolbox for unbiased and reproducible quantification of DTI metrics in the white matter. Images acquired using the rFOV sequence appear less distorted than those acquired using OVS alone. SC DTI parameter values obtained using both sequences at all sites were consistent with previous measurements made at 3T. For the same scanner manufacturer, DTI parameter inter-site SDs were smaller for the rFOV sequence compared to the OVS sequence. The higher inter-site reproducibility (for the same manufacturer and acquisition details, i.e. ZOOM data acquired at the two Philips sites) of rFOV compared to the OVS sequence supports the idea that making research options such as rFOV more widely available would improve accuracy of measurements obtained in multi-centre clinical trials. Future multi-centre studies should also aim to match the rFOV technique and signal-to-noise ratios in all sequences from different manufacturers/sites in order to avoid any bias in measured DTI parameters and ensure similar sensitivity to pathological changes.

Mots clés

Science & Technology; Multidisciplinary Sciences; Science & Technology - Other Topics; HUMAN OPTIC-NERVE; OF-THE-ART; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; MATTER DEMYELINATION; MRI; MOTION; FIELD; RESOLUTION; REDUCTION; ARTIFACTS

Sujet(s): 1900 Génie biomédical > 1900 Génie biomédical
1900 Génie biomédical > 1901 Technologie biomédicale
9000 Sciences de la santé > 9000 Sciences de la santé
Département: Institut de génie biomédical
Organismes subventionnaires: International Spinal Research Trust, Wings for Life, Multiple Sclerosis Society UK, Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme (UK), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Fonds de recherche du Québec--Santé (FRQS), Fonds de recherche du Québec--Nature et technologies (FRQNT), CRSNG, Réseau de bio-imagerie du Québec (RBIQ), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Strokes (NINDS)
Numéro de subvention: IMG007, 892, EP/I027084/1, 28826, 2015-PR-182754, 435897-2013, NIH/NINDS 5R21NS087465-02
URL de PolyPublie: https://publications.polymtl.ca/3517/
Titre de la revue: PLOS One (vol. 11, no 5)
Maison d'édition: PLOS
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155557
URL officielle: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155557
Date du dépôt: 05 déc. 2018 16:53
Dernière modification: 28 sept. 2024 14:25
Citer en APA 7: Samson, R. S., Lévy, S., Schneider, T., Smith, A. K., Smith, S. A., Cohen-Adad, J., & Wheeler-Kingshott, C. A. M. G. (2016). ZOOM or non-ZOOM? Assessing spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging protocols for multi-centre studies. PLOS One, 11(5), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155557

Statistiques

Total des téléchargements à partir de PolyPublie

Téléchargements par année

Provenance des téléchargements

Dimensions

Actions réservées au personnel

Afficher document Afficher document