Mathieu Chayer, Philippe Phan, Pierre‐Jean Arnoux, Zhi Wang and Carl-Éric Aubin
Article (2024)
Open Acess document in PolyPublie and at official publisher |
|
Open Access to the full text of this document Published Version Terms of Use: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives Download (5MB) |
|
|
Open Access to the full text of this document Supplemental Material Terms of Use: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives Download (193kB) |
|
|
Open Access to the full text of this document Supplemental Material Terms of Use: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives Download (256kB) |
Abstract
Background Oblique lumbar intervertebral fusion aims to decompress spinal nerves via an interbody fusion cage, but the optimal surgical strategy, including implant selection for specific patient characteristics, remains unclear. A biomechanical model was developed to assess how pathophysiological characteristics and instrumentation impact spinal realignment, indirect decompression, and cage subsidence risk.
Methods A finite element model of the L4-L5 segment was derived from a validated asymptomatic T1-S1 spine model. Five cases of grade I spondylolisthesis with normal or osteoporotic bone densities and initial disc heights of 4.3 to 8.3 mm were simulated. Oblique lumbar intervertebral fusion with cage heights of 10, 12, and 14 mm (12° lordosis) was examined. Postoperative changes in disc height, foraminal and spinal canal dimensions, segmental lordosis, and vertebral slip were assessed. Vertebral stresses and displacements under 10 Nm flexion and 400 N gravitational load were compared between stand-alone constructs and bilateral pedicle screw fixation using rods of 4.75, 5.5, and 6 mm diameters.
Findings Oblique lumbar intervertebral fusion significantly improved postoperative disc height, foraminal and spinal canal dimensions, with the greatest enhancements observed with 14 mm cages. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation markedly reduced cortical endplate stresses and displacements compared to stand-alone constructs, with added benefits from larger rod diameters. Low bone density increased displacements by 63 %.
Interpretation Thicker cages achieve better decompression but increase subsidence risk. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation with 6 mm rods minimizes endplate stresses and displacements, especially in osteoporotic cases. Future research will validate these findings and explore the model's potential for surgical planning.
Uncontrolled Keywords
lumbar spine surgery; biomechanical study; oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF); finite element modelling; indirect decompression
Subjects: |
1900 Biomedical engineering > 1900 Biomedical engineering 1900 Biomedical engineering > 1901 Biomedical technology |
---|---|
Department: | Institut de génie biomédical |
Funders: | NSERC / CRSNG, Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies, TransMedTech Institute |
PolyPublie URL: | https://publications.polymtl.ca/59443/ |
Journal Title: | Clinical Biomechanics (vol. 120) |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106352 |
Official URL: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106352 |
Date Deposited: | 30 Oct 2024 10:11 |
Last Modified: | 09 Dec 2024 13:33 |
Cite in APA 7: | Chayer, M., Phan, P., Arnoux, P.‐J., Wang, Z., & Aubin, C.-É. (2024). Biomechanical modelling of indirect decompression in oblique lumbar intervertebral fusions – A finite element study. Clinical Biomechanics, 120, 106352 (9 pages). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106352 |
---|---|
Statistics
Total downloads
Downloads per month in the last year
Origin of downloads
Dimensions