<  Retour au portail Polytechnique Montréal

Evaluation of conventional surrogate indicators of safety for connected and automated vehicles in car following at signalized intersections

Wooseok Do, Nicolas Saunier et Luis Miranda-Moreno

Article de revue (2024)

Document en libre accès dans PolyPublie et chez l'éditeur officiel
[img]
Affichage préliminaire
Libre accès au plein texte de ce document
Version officielle de l'éditeur
Conditions d'utilisation: Creative Commons: Attribution-Pas d'utilisation commerciale (CC BY-NC)
Télécharger (2MB)
Afficher le résumé
Cacher le résumé

Abstract

The driving behaviors of connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) will differ from those of human-driven vehicles (HDVs) because the CAVs’ driving decisions are controlled by computers. Because of the limited amount of crash data for CAVs, researchers have relied on surrogate measures of safety to assess their safety impacts. However, they often use the same safety indicators for CAVs that were used for HDVs, raising questions about the adequacy of the safety indicators for CAVs. This study aims to investigate the suitability of using conventional safety indicators for CAVs. To achieve this, we evaluated eight safety indicators used for CAVs in the literature: time-to-collision (TTC), post-encroachment time (PET), time-exposed TTC, time-integrated TTC, deceleration rate to avoid a crash (DRAC), crash-potential index, rear-end-collision risk index, and potential index for collision with urgent deceleration (PICUD). For the evaluation, we first simulate CAVs on an approaching lane of signalized intersections using the acceleration-control algorithm. The algorithm replaces the HDV trajectories with CAVs for mixed simulations where HDVs and CAVs coexist. Analyzing the simulation output, we examined the safety indicators for the various car-following scenarios and the CAV proportions. The findings suggest that PET and PICUD can yield different safety implications for CAVs because of their small-gap car-following characteristics. Ignoring such characteristics may lead to interpreting the small-gap car-following situations as simply dangerous traffic interactions for CAVs. The car-following experiments indicate that TTC, PET, and DRAC are insufficient in measuring the safety implications when successive vehicles operate at similar speeds for CAVs.

Mots clés

operations; traffic simulation; automated/autonomous/connected vehicles; surrogate safety measures; safety; transportation safety management systems; safety effects of connected/automated vehicles

Sujet(s): 1000 Génie civil > 1000 Génie civil
1000 Génie civil > 1003 Génie du transport
Département: Département des génies civil, géologique et des mines
Organismes subventionnaires: Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur les réseaux d’entreprise, la logistique et le transport (CIRRELT)
URL de PolyPublie: https://publications.polymtl.ca/59142/
Titre de la revue: Transportation Research Record
Maison d'édition: Sage publications inc
DOI: 10.1177/03611981241265849
URL officielle: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241265849
Date du dépôt: 04 sept. 2024 15:38
Dernière modification: 25 sept. 2024 16:51
Citer en APA 7: Do, W., Saunier, N., & Miranda-Moreno, L. (2024). Evaluation of conventional surrogate indicators of safety for connected and automated vehicles in car following at signalized intersections. Transportation Research Record, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241265849

Statistiques

Total des téléchargements à partir de PolyPublie

Téléchargements par année

Provenance des téléchargements

Dimensions

Actions réservées au personnel

Afficher document Afficher document