Masafumi Idei, Takeshi Nomura, Philippe Jouvet, Carl-Éric Aubin, Atsushi Kawaguchi and Masashi Nakagawa
Article (2020)
Open Acess document in PolyPublie and at official publisher |
|
Open Access to the full text of this document Published Version Terms of Use: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives Download (859kB) |
Abstract
Objectives:
To assess the impact of the use of aerosol barrier device, Splashguard-CG, on the endotracheal intubation with different types of laryngoscope.
Design:
A pilot randomized sequential crossover simulation study. Setting:
A single academic center in Japan.
Subjects:
Physicians in a single academic university hospital in Japan.
Interventions:
Use of Splashguard-CG.
Measurements and Main Results:
All participants were asked to perform endotracheal intubation to a manikin simulator using three different devices (Macintosh laryngoscope; Airway Scope [Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan]; and McGRATH MAC [Aircraft Medical, Edinburgh, United Kingdom]) with and without Splashguard-CG in place, which required a total of six attempts and measured the intubation time as the primary outcome. Thirty physicians (15 experienced physicians and 15 less-experienced physicians) were included. Intubation time using Macintosh laryngoscope was significantly longer in the group with Macintosh laryngoscope and Splashguard-CG compared with the group without Splashguard-CG by the median difference of 4.3 seconds (interquartile range, 2.6–7.4 s; p < 0.001). There was no significant increase in the intubation time with or without Splashguard-CG for the Airway Scope (0.6 s; interquartile range, –3.7 to 3.2 s; p = 0.97) and the McGRATH MAC (0.5 s; interquartile range, –1.4 to 4.6 s; p = 0.09). This trend was found in both the experienced and less-experienced groups. We observed significant increases of subjective difficulty of the endotracheal intubation evaluated by using a Visual Analog Scale in the Splashguard-CG groups for all three types of devices.
Conclusions:
The use of a video laryngoscope with an aerosol barrier device does not impact the time required endotracheal intubation in a simulation environment. This method can be considered as airway management for coronavirus disease 2019.
Uncontrolled Keywords
aerosol; barrier device; coronavirus disease 2019; endotracheal intubation.
Subjects: | 2100 Mechanical engineering > 2100 Mechanical engineering |
---|---|
Department: | Department of Mechanical Engineering |
PolyPublie URL: | https://publications.polymtl.ca/54291/ |
Journal Title: | Critical care explorations (vol. 2, no. 10) |
Publisher: | Wolters Kluwer |
DOI: | 10.1097/cce.0000000000000234 |
Official URL: | https://doi.org/10.1097/cce.0000000000000234 |
Date Deposited: | 13 Nov 2023 09:48 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2024 06:03 |
Cite in APA 7: | Idei, M., Nomura, T., Jouvet, P., Aubin, C.-É., Kawaguchi, A., & Nakagawa, M. (2020). Video Laryngoscope Intubation With an Aerosol Barrier Device: A Randomized Sequential Crossover Pilot Study. Critical care explorations, 2(10), e0234 (4 pages). https://doi.org/10.1097/cce.0000000000000234 |
---|---|
Statistics
Total downloads
Downloads per month in the last year
Origin of downloads
Dimensions