<  Retour au portail Polytechnique Montréal

Video Laryngoscope Intubation With an Aerosol Barrier Device: A Randomized Sequential Crossover Pilot Study

Masafumi Idei, Takeshi Nomura, Philippe Jouvet, Carl-Éric Aubin, Atsushi Kawaguchi et Masashi Nakagawa

Article de revue (2020)

Document en libre accès dans PolyPublie et chez l'éditeur officiel
[img]
Affichage préliminaire
Libre accès au plein texte de ce document
Version officielle de l'éditeur
Conditions d'utilisation: Creative Commons: Attribution-Pas d'utilisation commerciale-Pas de modification (CC BY-NC-ND)
Télécharger (859kB)
Afficher le résumé
Cacher le résumé

Abstract

Objectives:

To assess the impact of the use of aerosol barrier device, Splashguard-CG, on the endotracheal intubation with different types of laryngoscope.

Design:

A pilot randomized sequential crossover simulation study. Setting:

A single academic center in Japan.

Subjects:

Physicians in a single academic university hospital in Japan.

Interventions:

Use of Splashguard-CG.

Measurements and Main Results:

All participants were asked to perform endotracheal intubation to a manikin simulator using three different devices (Macintosh laryngoscope; Airway Scope [Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan]; and McGRATH MAC [Aircraft Medical, Edinburgh, United Kingdom]) with and without Splashguard-CG in place, which required a total of six attempts and measured the intubation time as the primary outcome. Thirty physicians (15 experienced physicians and 15 less-experienced physicians) were included. Intubation time using Macintosh laryngoscope was significantly longer in the group with Macintosh laryngoscope and Splashguard-CG compared with the group without Splashguard-CG by the median difference of 4.3 seconds (interquartile range, 2.6–7.4 s; p < 0.001). There was no significant increase in the intubation time with or without Splashguard-CG for the Airway Scope (0.6 s; interquartile range, –3.7 to 3.2 s; p = 0.97) and the McGRATH MAC (0.5 s; interquartile range, –1.4 to 4.6 s; p = 0.09). This trend was found in both the experienced and less-experienced groups. We observed significant increases of subjective difficulty of the endotracheal intubation evaluated by using a Visual Analog Scale in the Splashguard-CG groups for all three types of devices.

Conclusions:

The use of a video laryngoscope with an aerosol barrier device does not impact the time required endotracheal intubation in a simulation environment. This method can be considered as airway management for coronavirus disease 2019.

Mots clés

aerosol; barrier device; coronavirus disease 2019; endotracheal intubation.

Sujet(s): 2100 Génie mécanique > 2100 Génie mécanique
Département: Département de génie mécanique
URL de PolyPublie: https://publications.polymtl.ca/54291/
Titre de la revue: Critical care explorations (vol. 2, no 10)
Maison d'édition: Wolters Kluwer
DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000234
URL officielle: https://doi.org/10.1097/cce.0000000000000234
Date du dépôt: 13 nov. 2023 09:48
Dernière modification: 27 sept. 2024 06:03
Citer en APA 7: Idei, M., Nomura, T., Jouvet, P., Aubin, C.-É., Kawaguchi, A., & Nakagawa, M. (2020). Video Laryngoscope Intubation With an Aerosol Barrier Device: A Randomized Sequential Crossover Pilot Study. Critical care explorations, 2(10), e0234 (4 pages). https://doi.org/10.1097/cce.0000000000000234

Statistiques

Total des téléchargements à partir de PolyPublie

Téléchargements par année

Provenance des téléchargements

Dimensions

Actions réservées au personnel

Afficher document Afficher document