 | Monter d'un niveau |
Buyck, M., Levy, A., Tabone, L., Aubin, C.-É., Jouvet, P. A., & Baudin, F. (2021). Pediatric barrier enclosure for nasopharyngeal suctioning during Covid-19 pandemic: A simulation based-study. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 45, 608-610. Lien externe
Dubé-Cyr, R., Aubin, C.-É., Villemure, I., & Arnoux, P.-J. (2021). Biomechanical analysis of the number of implants for the immediate sacroiliac joint fixation. Spine Deformity, 9(5), 1267-1273. Lien externe
Dube-Cyr, R., Villemure, I., Arnoux, P. J., Rawlinson, J., & Aubin, C.-É. (2021). Instrumentation of the sacroiliac joint with cylindrical threaded implants: A detailed finite element study of patient characteristics affecting fixation performance. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 39(12), 2693-2702. Lien externe
Guy, A., Labelle, H., Barchi, S., & Aubin, C.-É. (janvier 2021). The impact of immediate in-brace 3D corrections on curve evolution after two years of treatment: Preliminary results [Communication écrite]. International Research Society of Spinal Deformities. Lien externe
Guy, A., Labelle, H., Barchi, S., Audet-Duchesne, E., Cobetto, N., Parent, S., Raison, M., & Aubin, C.-É. (2021). Braces Designed Using CAD/CAM Combined or Not With Finite Element Modeling Lead to Effective Treatment and Quality of Life After 2 Years : A Randomized Controlled Trial. Spine, 46(1), 9-16. Disponible
La Barbera, L., Larson, A. N., & Aubin, C.-É. (2021). Correction objectives have higher impact than screw pattern and density on the optimal 3D correction of thoracic AIS: a biomechanical study. Spine Deformity, 9(3), 655-664. Disponible
La Barbera, L., Larson, A. N., & Aubin, C.-É. (2021). How do spine instrumentation parameters influence the 3D correction of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A patient-specific biomechanical study. Clinical Biomechanics, 84, 10 pages. Lien externe
La Barbera, L., Larson, A. N., Rawlinson, J., & Aubin, C.-É. (2021). In silico patient-specific optimization of correction strategies for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clinical Biomechanics, 81, 105200 (11 pages). Lien externe
Mahecha, D., Beaudry, C., Aubin, C.-É., & Armellini, F. (mai 2021). Numerical transformation in the "health ecosystem" - A bibliometric analysis 1994-2021 [Communication écrite]. 1st 4POINT0 Conference on Policies, Practices and Processes related to the Performance of Innovation Ecosystems. Non disponible
Parent, S., Duarte, M. P., Aubin, C.-É., Cobetto, N., Roy-Beaudry, M., Bellefleur, C., Turgeon, I., Labelle, H., & Barchi, S. (octobre 2021). 3D radiological outcomes for patients with moderate idiopathic scoliosis curves treated with internal (anterior vertebral growth modulation) vs external bracing: 2 years observational study [Résumé]. EUROSPINE 2021, Vienna, Austria (1 page). Publié dans Brain and Spine, 1(S1). Disponible
Sarwark, J. F., Castelein, R. M., Lam, T. P., Aubin, C.-É., Maqsood, A., Moldovan, F., & Cheng, J. (2021). Elucidating the inherent features of IS to better understand idiopathic scoliosis etiology and progression. Journal of Orthopaedics, 26, 126-129. Lien externe
Wang, X., Aubin, C.-É., & Schwend, R. M. (janvier 2021). Concave or convex rod translation first in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis instrumentation with differential rod contouring? [Communication écrite]. International Research Society of Spinal Deformities bi-annual meeting. Lien externe
