Markus Berger, Winnie Gerbens-Leenes, Fatemeh Karandish, Maite M. Aldaya, Anne-Marie Boulay, Rick J. Hogeboom, Andreas Link, Alessandro Manzardo, Oleksandr Mialyk, Masaharu Motoshita, Montserrat Núñez, Stephan Pfister, Ralph K. Rosenbaum, Laura Scherer, Han Su and Lara Wöhler
Article (2025)
|
Open Access to the full text of this document Published Version Terms of Use: Creative Commons Attribution Download (4MB) |
|
|
Open Access to the full text of this document Supplemental Material Terms of Use: Creative Commons Attribution Download (921kB) |
Abstract
Considering globally increasing water challenges, the analysis of water use along supply chains is of great relevance and can be tackled by mainly two methodological approaches: Water Footprint Assessment (WFA) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). While sharing the same goal of promoting sustainable water use, both methods developed in different contexts and scientific communities. This has led to heated debates on methodological presuppositions that at times has become unconstructive. To build mutual understanding and enable a fruitful cooperation, researchers from both communities have exchanged over the course of two years. This paper summarizes the outcomes of this discussion series by providing i) a description of the development of both approaches and their ways of assessing freshwater consumption and pollution, ii) an application in a case study, and iii) an analysis of strengths and weaknesses in relation to questions decision-makers may have. Our analysis revealed that WFA’s strength lies in its ability to measure freshwater appropriation, water-use efficiency, water scarcity and total pollution levels. This makes WFA particularly useful for crop selection as well as agricultural and river basin water management. With its focus on assessing impacts, LCA is strong in quantifying potential consequences of water use for humans and ecosystems. This makes it particularly useful for assessing complex supply chains and for analysing water-related impacts in combination with other environmental aspects. Rather than being in competition with each other, we emphasize the individual and complementary strengths of both approaches and their joint efforts in addressing the world’s pressing water challenges.
Uncontrolled Keywords
| Department: | Department of Chemical Engineering |
|---|---|
| Research Center: | CIRAIG - International Reference Centre for the Life Cycle of Products, Processes and Services |
| Funders: | Generalitat de Catalunya, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, European Social Fund, AGAUR (Generalitat de Catalunya) |
| Grant number: | 2021 SGR 01568, GROW-101041110, RYC 2020 |
| PolyPublie URL: | https://publications.polymtl.ca/64503/ |
| Journal Title: | Ecological Indicators (vol. 174) |
| Publisher: | Elsevier |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113458 |
| Official URL: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113458 |
| Date Deposited: | 15 Apr 2025 11:54 |
| Last Modified: | 26 Feb 2026 10:12 |
| Cite in APA 7: | Berger, M., Gerbens-Leenes, W., Karandish, F., Aldaya, M. M., Boulay, A.-M., Hogeboom, R. J., Link, A., Manzardo, A., Mialyk, O., Motoshita, M., Núñez, M., Pfister, S., Rosenbaum, R. K., Scherer, L., Su, H., & Wöhler, L. (2025). Complementary strengths of water footprint and life cycle assessments in analyzing global freshwater appropriation and its local impacts – Recommendations from an interdisciplinary discussion series. Ecological Indicators, 174, 113458 (20 pages). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113458 |
|---|---|
Statistics
Total downloads
Downloads per month in the last year
Origin of downloads
Dimensions
