<  Retour au portail Polytechnique Montréal

Experimental methods in chemical engineering–Validation of steady‐state simulation

Caroline Brucel, Émilie Thibault, Gregory Scott Patience et Paul R. Stuart

Article de revue (2025)

Document en libre accès dans PolyPublie et chez l'éditeur officiel
[img]
Affichage préliminaire
Libre accès au plein texte de ce document
Version officielle de l'éditeur
Conditions d'utilisation: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY)
Télécharger (2MB)
Afficher le résumé
Cacher le résumé

Abstract

Steady-state simulation (Aspen, PRO/II, WinGEMS, CADSIM Plus) guides equipment selection, operating conditions, and optimization to design chemical processes like Kraft pulping, specialty chemicals, and petrochemical complexes. Ensuring that the simulation characterizes the yields, heat transfer loads, purity, utilities demand, and profitability requires data that represents the physicochemical and transport properties of each stream and unit operation. Here, we present strategies to validate steady-state simulations against plant data and expectations from operators. To build and validate simulations requires real-time data, but errors contaminate measurements and dynamic conditions—start-up, shut-downs, process upsets—compromise fidelity. A pre-treatment step removes incongruous data to build the simulation on process conditions representative of steady-state. Working through the process with experts (informal validation) and comparing simulation results with plant data (formal validation) reduces gross error with an objective to achieve a simulation accuracy to within one standard deviation of measurement variability. A bibliometric review highlights the limited focus on steady-state simulation validation in the field of process engineering. Most articles mention accuracy but neglect to describe how it is evaluated. Despite this scarcity, validation remains a critical factor in various domains of chemical engineering research. Interviews with professionals offer a practical perspective on the applications of simulation in an industrial context like process monitoring, equipment performance analysis, operator training, and decision-making. Finally, a case study demonstrates how to implement data treatment and validation for Kraft mill brownstock washing department: Applying multiple validation techniques increases the value and confidence in the simulation.

Mots clés

Sujet(s): 1800 Génie chimique > 1800 Génie chimique
Département: Département de génie chimique
URL de PolyPublie: https://publications.polymtl.ca/62512/
Titre de la revue: Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Maison d'édition: Wiley
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.25601
URL officielle: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.25601
Date du dépôt: 27 janv. 2025 14:21
Dernière modification: 08 févr. 2025 04:20
Citer en APA 7: Brucel, C., Thibault, É., Patience, G. S., & Stuart, P. R. (2025). Experimental methods in chemical engineering–Validation of steady‐state simulation. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 25601 (20 pages). https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.25601

Statistiques

Total des téléchargements à partir de PolyPublie

Téléchargements par année

Loading...

Provenance des téléchargements

Loading...

Dimensions

Actions réservées au personnel

Afficher document Afficher document