Urban access across the globe: an international comparison of different transport modes

Hao Wu, Paolo Avner, Geneviève Boisjoly, Carlos Kauê Vieira Braga, Ahmed El-Geneidy, Jie Huang, Tamara Kerzhner, Brendan Murphy, Michael A. Niedzielski, Rafael H. M. Pereira, John P. Pritchard, Anson Stewart, Jiaoe Wang, David Levinson

Article de revue (2021)

Accéder à ce document
Disponible
Libre accès au texte intégral dans PolyPublie et chez l'éditeur officiel
Version officielle de l'éditeur
Texte Texte • 2MB •

Résumé

Access (the ease of reaching valued destinations) is underpinned by land use and transport infrastructure. The importance of access in transport, sustainability, and urban economics is increasingly recognized. In particular, access provides a universal unit of measurement to examine cities for the efficiency of transport and land-use systems. This paper examines the relationship between population-weighted access and metropolitan population in global metropolitan areas (cities) using 30-min cumulative access to jobs for 4 different modes of transport; 117 cities from 16 countries and 6 continents are included. Sprawling development with the intensive road network in American cities produces modest automobile access relative to their sizes, but American cities lag behind globally in transit and walking access; Australian and Canadian cities have lower automobile access, but better transit access than American cities; combining compact development with an intensive network produces the highest access in Chinese and European cities for their sizes. Hence density and mobility co-produce better access. This paper finds access to jobs increases with populations sublinearly, so doubling the metropolitan population results in less than double access to jobs. The relationship between population and access characterizes regions, countries, and cities, and significant similarities exist between cities from the same country.

Matériel d'accompagnement:
Organismes subventionnaires:
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute for Applied Economic Research, ASTRID, Social Sciences Research Council of Canada, Polish National Science Centre, European Union’s Horizon 2020, National Accessibility Evaluation
Numéro de subvention:
XDA19040402, 485-14-038, UMO-2015/19/P/HS4/04067, 665778
Adresse URL de PolyPublie:
Titre de la revue :
npj Urban Sustainability ( vol. 1 )
Maison d'édition:
Springer Nature
OAI:
oai:publications.polymtl.ca:54295
ORCID
Date du dépôt:
13 nov. 2023 10:02
Dernière modification:
14 oct. 2026 14:12
Citer en APA 7:
Wu, H., Avner, P., Boisjoly, G., Braga, C. K. V., El-Geneidy, A., Huang, J., Kerzhner, T., Murphy, B., Niedzielski, M. A., Pereira, R. H. M., Pritchard, J. P., Stewart, A., Wang, J., & Levinson, D. (2021). Urban access across the globe: an international comparison of different transport modes. npj Urban Sustainability, 1, 16 (9 pages). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00020-2

Statistiques

Total des téléchargements à partir de PolyPublie

Téléchargements par année

Provenance des téléchargements

Dimensions

Actions réservées au personnel

Afficher document
Afficher document