Catherine Beaudry, Heidi Prozesky, Carl St-Pierre and Seyed Reza Mirnezami
Article (2023)
|
Open Access to the full text of this document Published Version Terms of Use: Creative Commons Attribution Download (947kB) |
|
|
Open Access to the full text of this document Supplemental Material Terms of Use: Creative Commons Attribution Download (750kB) |
Abstract
A large body of literature on gender differences in scientific publication output has clearly established that women scientists publish less that men do. Yet, no single explanation or group of explanations satisfactorily accounts for this difference, which has been called the “productivity puzzle”. To provide a more refined portrait of the scientific publication output of women in relation to that of their male peers, we conducted a web-based survey in 2016 of individual researchers across all African countries, except Libya. The resulting 6,875 valid questionnaires submitted by respondents in the STEM, Health Science and SSH fields were analyzed using multivariate regressions on the self-reported number of articles published in the preceding 3 years. Controlling for a variety of variables including career stage, workload, mobility, research field, and collaboration, we measured the direct and moderating effect of gender on scientific production of African researchers. Our results show that, while women's scientific publication output is positively affected by collaboration and age (impediments to women's scientific output decrease later in their careers), it is negatively impacted by care-work and household chores, limited mobility, and teaching hours. Women are as prolific when they devote the same hours to other academic tasks and raise the same amount of research funding as their male colleagues. Our results lead us to argue that the standard academic career model, relying on continuous publications and regular promotions, assumes a masculine life cycle that reinforces the general perception that women with discontinuous careers are less productive than their male colleagues, and systematically disadvantages women. We conclude that the solution resides beyond women's empowerment, i.e., in the broader institutions of education and the family, which have an important role to play in fostering men's equal contribution to household chores and care-work.
Uncontrolled Keywords
Subjects: |
1600 Industrial engineering > 1600 Industrial engineering 1600 Industrial engineering > 1601 Operations research and management science 1600 Industrial engineering > 1605 Human factors engineering 1600 Industrial engineering > 1606 Operations management |
---|---|
Department: | Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering |
Research Center: | CIRST - Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie |
Funders: | International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Robert Bosch Stiftung, DSINRF Centre of Excellence in Scientometrics, STI Policy |
Grant number: | 107987-001, 11.5F081-0006.0 |
PolyPublie URL: | https://publications.polymtl.ca/52307/ |
Journal Title: | Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics (vol. 8) |
Publisher: | Frontiers Media |
DOI: | 10.3389/frma.2023.1040823 |
Official URL: | https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1040823 |
Date Deposited: | 18 Apr 2023 14:58 |
Last Modified: | 16 Apr 2025 22:25 |
Cite in APA 7: | Beaudry, C., Prozesky, H., St-Pierre, C., & Mirnezami, S. R. (2023). Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa — A gender perspective. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 8, 1040823 (15 pages). https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1040823 |
---|---|
Statistics
Total downloads
Downloads per month in the last year
Origin of downloads
Dimensions