Rutger Matthes, Claudia Bender, Rabea Schlüter, Ina Koban, René Bussiahn, Stephan Reuter, Jürgen Lademann, Klaus-Dieter Weltmann et Axel Kramer
Article de revue (2013)
Document en libre accès dans PolyPublie et chez l'éditeur officiel |
Document publié alors que les auteurs ou autrices n'étaient pas affiliés à Polytechnique Montréal
|
Libre accès au plein texte de ce document Version officielle de l'éditeur Conditions d'utilisation: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY) Télécharger (1MB) |
Abstract
The treatment of infected wounds is one possible therapeutic aspect of plasma medicine. Chronic wounds are often associated with microbial biofilms which limit the efficacy of antiseptics. The present study investigates two different surface barrier discharges with air plasma to compare their efficacy against microbial biofilms with chlorhexidine digluconate solution (CHX) as representative of an important antibiofilm antiseptic. Pseudomonas aeruginosa SG81 and Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A were cultivated on polycarbonate discs. The biofilms were treated for 30, 60, 150, 300 or 600 s with plasma or for 600 s with 0.1% CHX, respectively. After treatment, biofilms were dispensed by ultrasound and the antimicrobial effects were determined as difference in the number of the colony forming units by microbial culture. A high antimicrobial efficacy on biofilms of both plasma sources in comparison to CHX treatment was shown. The efficacy differs between the used strains and plasma sources. For illustration, the biofilms were examined under a scanning electron microscope before and after treatment. Additionally, cytotoxicity was determined by the MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay with L929 mouse fibroblast cell line. The cell toxicity of the used plasma limits its applicability on human tissue to maximally 150 s. The emitted UV irradiance was measured to estimate whether UV could limit the application on human tissue at the given parameters. It was found that the UV emission is negligibly low. In conclusion, the results support the assumption that air plasma could be an option for therapy of chronic wounds.
Mots clés
Anti-Infective Agents/chemistry/*pharmacology; Anti-Infective Agents, Local/chemistry/pharmacology; Biofilms/*drug effects; Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives/chemistry; Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects; Staphylococcus epidermidis/drug effects
Sujet(s): |
3100 Physique > 3100 Physique 3100 Physique > 3107 Physique des plasmas |
---|---|
Département: | Département de génie physique |
Organismes subventionnaires: | German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) |
Numéro de subvention: | 13N9779, 13N11181, 03Z2DN12 |
URL de PolyPublie: | https://publications.polymtl.ca/5024/ |
Titre de la revue: | PLOS One (vol. 8, no 7) |
Maison d'édition: | PLOS |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0070462 |
URL officielle: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070462 |
Date du dépôt: | 11 mai 2023 14:19 |
Dernière modification: | 27 sept. 2024 06:54 |
Citer en APA 7: | Matthes, R., Bender, C., Schlüter, R., Koban, I., Bussiahn, R., Reuter, S., Lademann, J., Weltmann, K.-D., & Kramer, A. (2013). Antimicrobial efficacy of two surface barrier discharges with air plasma against in vitro biofilms. PLOS One, 8(7), e70462 (11 pages). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070462 |
---|---|
Statistiques
Total des téléchargements à partir de PolyPublie
Téléchargements par année
Provenance des téléchargements
Dimensions