<  Retour au portail Polytechnique Montréal

Marked differences between continuous long-term and clinical snapshot examinations : is the current standard of back pain diagnostics outdated?

Hendrik Schmidt, Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl, Maxim Bashkuev, Luis A. Becker, Matthias Pumberger, Georg N. Duda et Sandra Reitmaier

Article de revue (2024)

Document en libre accès chez l'éditeur officiel
Un lien externe est disponible pour ce document
Afficher le résumé
Cacher le résumé

Abstract

Current clinical examination of low back pain (LBP) patients primarily relies on static clinical examinations, which rarely represent the dynamic postures patients adopt during daily activities. To gain an overview on the dynamic kinematics-kinetics changes over a day, the lumbar back kinematics of asymptomatic individuals and LBP patients were measured over 24 hours, and the passively resisted bending and torsional moments were estimated.208 asymptomatic subjects (115 females) and 116 LBP patients (71 females) were analysed.Compared to static upright standing, the mean lumbar lordosis of asymptomatic subjects drops significantly by 21° during everyday life (p<0.01). Maximum bending moments of 44.0-50.6Nm were estimated at the L2-L3. LBP patients showed significantly lower (p<0.01) lumbar flattening during daily life of about 16°. Maximum bending moments of 27-52_Nm were found at the L3-L4. The initial static upright lumbar lordosis was significantly lower in LBP population (by 6°) resulting in almost similar average lumbar shapes during daily activities in both groups.The torsional movements were with 2.2° greatest in L1-L2 independent of sex (p=0.19) and LBP (p=0.54) with moments of 6-16_Nm.The lumbar profile and associated internal moments during daily life differ substantially from those recorded during clinical examinations. LBP patients demonstrates significantly lower lordosis at the snapshot assessment and significantly lower movement variations and internal moments during daily life. Only the dynamic long-term assessments unravelled a less flexed posture in LBP population. Apparently, such a reduced dynamic flexed posture indicates a compensatory habit for pain relief.

Mots clés

spine loading; in vivo; lumbar profile; kinematics; kinetics; bending moments; torsion; stiffness

Sujet(s): 1900 Génie biomédical > 1900 Génie biomédical
2100 Génie mécanique > 2100 Génie mécanique
Département: Département de génie mécanique
URL de PolyPublie: https://publications.polymtl.ca/58780/
Titre de la revue: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (vol. 12)
Maison d'édition: Frontiers
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1411958
URL officielle: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1411958
Date du dépôt: 21 août 2024 00:09
Dernière modification: 25 sept. 2024 16:51
Citer en APA 7: Schmidt, H., Shirazi-Adl, A., Bashkuev, M., Becker, L. A., Pumberger, M., Duda, G. N., & Reitmaier, S. (2024). Marked differences between continuous long-term and clinical snapshot examinations : is the current standard of back pain diagnostics outdated? Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 12, 1411958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1411958

Statistiques

Dimensions

Actions réservées au personnel

Afficher document Afficher document